Skip to main content

Michael Neff Loses it at the Office

Yes, that's me in my younger days.

But where was this version of Michael Neff? In the AEI Films and Books office in LA? Yes, that's it. I was a development executive then, yes, and holding a workshop there, attempting to talk a few genre writers into analyzing structure in screenplays before rewriting their novels. 

So why did I become crazed? Rejecting a bad manuscript, or maybe a terrible pitch? That must have been it. A pitch too far, and I lost it. I tried to be patient, but it didn't work. The writer was a narcissist, a flipping ego maniac, thus escorting me to the brink, to the point where I actually resembled the Cage man himself!

Look at the Cage man! What is he saying here?

"I'm sorry, Alva, it's just too late. Too late to add a plot line with a cliffhanger. It's all TOO LATE!!!"

To which the now terrified writer replies: "I'm sorry, Mr. Neff, I'll search passionately for a plot, and premise first, yes ... a premise that will sell, and--"

"TOO LATE!  TOOOOOO LATE!"

Michael Neff

Comments

  1. Ohhhh, Neff is on the Writer's EDGE!!!

    Such a teddy bear. Thank you for all you've done for me. I am a published author with a major house, mostly because of you.

    Love,
    J

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Michael,

    You just need a litte Jesus in your life. Bless you my son.

    Liam

    ReplyDelete
  3. LOL. Better get several good bottles of whiskey before you enter the hellish den of back to back power pitch sessions. Of course, you'll probably be mobbed by fans wanting Cage's autograph. By the second day, I doubt anyone will be able to distinguish the difference!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Neff losing it? Perish the thought. After dealing with an endless line of aspiring authors - each one more confused & crazy than the last - can you blame him for essentially "getting to the point" in his own imicable way? (Yes, Michael, I know that sentence was too long...)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jane Ann Martin2:26 PM

    Michael Neff has done more to help me learn what it takes to become a published author than everyone else I've known put together.

    Thank you Michael!

    Hugs,
    JA

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Worthy WE Wisdom

Top Seven Reasons Aspiring Authors Fail to Publish

At a conservative estimate, upwards of 250,000 writers in the U.S. are currently struggling to write or find an agent for their first commercial novel or memoir. If you understand this business, you also know why an enormous percentage are unable to make it happen. Below are my top seven reasons why otherwise passionate writers will join the 99.9% never to become commercially published (btw, to read other valid perspectives on this, click on the " novel rejection reasons " label on the right). 1. NEOPHYTE SKILL SET AND A FAILURE TO COMPREHEND THE PROBLEM   In the case of the writer's prose narrative, it just does not display the kind of energy, cinema, creativity, and polish necessary to convince a gatekeeper professional to go deeper. The first line falls with a thud, and the graph dips from there into a pond of blah. This circumstance is perhaps the number one cause of quick rejection. Usually, the writer in question is sufficiently new to the game, not aware,

"Top Ten Worst Pieces of Writing Advice" (and it gets worse)

OUTSIDE OF NARCISSISM, IMPATIENCE AND BAD ADVICE ARE A WRITER'S WORST ENEMIES . If you ever attend writer events, you will never cease to hear utterances of bad writing advice, the popular kind that circulate like  ruinous viral memes through the nervous systems of America's aborning novel writers. And each time you are exposed, you either chuckle or swear, depending on your mood and the circumstance. You might make a daring attempt to kill the meme in its tracks before it can infect someone else, or you might just stare at the writer with a dumbfounded look and ask, "Where the hell did you hear that?" Yes, the primal question: WHERE THE HELL DID YOU HEAR THAT? Inevitably, many will point to their writer's group . Ahhhh, of course , you think. Why just recently at an Algonkian event , one of my faculty (a former senior editor at Random House) and I were faced with an individual who adamantly asserted to us both that using only one point of view to write a n